14 Comments
User's avatar
RB's avatar

Good article - always fun to speculate who Satoshi was. I’ve been down a similar rabbit hole from a tech perspective but nowadays just read what others think. My guess would be someone in the orbit of Hal, Nick and Adam, or someone monitoring them closely. I wouldn’t want to say a name because those poor guys get too much hassle if anyone suspects them. That said, idiots like Craig Wright who fraudulently claim to be Satoshi deserve all the shit they get!

If you have a couple of spare hours (eg fairly mindless TV on in the background while doing things like reading your blog comments) then a bit of entertainment on this theme is the HBO Documentary ‘Money Electric‘ which is on Sky in the UK.

Meanwhile, on Christmas Day we had a harmlessly entertaining family film on - Peter Rabbit 2 - and it featured the character S Nakamoto, from NAKAMOTO Farms, selling dried fruit at the town market stall … so maybe the real identity goes back over a century to Beatrix Potter. Who knew?

Cheers

Expand full comment
Stevan Popovic's avatar

First half of money electric is quite good. Then it fills up time talking about who Satoshi is. A waste of time.

Expand full comment
Dominic Frisby's avatar

Wow! what a coincidence ... that's a dicovery

Expand full comment
Brian McC's avatar

I re-listened to Dominic’s Bitcoin book on Audible over Christmas while in the States and, as always, kicked myself for not buying £10k’s worth back in 2015 when I first listened. The narration is engaging and amusing, which softens the regret a little. I reckon Satoshi was an avatar for a three-man committee: Finney, Back, and Szabo. But ultimately, speculating on Satoshi’s identity feels a bit like wondering who the Mona Lisa really was.

Expand full comment
Dominic Frisby's avatar

Indeed! Thanks Brian

Expand full comment
Stevan Popovic's avatar

The other theory is it's the creator of true crypt. Paul Calder Leroux.

Expand full comment
Dominic Frisby's avatar

That's not one I've looked at ... Maybe if I wrote another book

Expand full comment
Jeremy McKeown's avatar

A great read Dominic, thanks.

Expand full comment
Dominic Frisby's avatar

Thanks Jeremy

Expand full comment
Jimbo's avatar

Dominic, have you been down the CIA/NSA/GCHQ rabbithole with Bitcoin? I know this is Raoul Pal's working hypothesis, re. that it came out of the intelligence agencies and that Satoshi was actually several different people. I have no strong opinion on this myself, but do wonder if it has ever been explored in any significant detail, insofar as this is even possible...

Expand full comment
Dominic Frisby's avatar

No, I think that came after I wrote the book ... so I've been less motivated to go exploring ... but US INtel is a commonly held theory.

Expand full comment
Oh's avatar

No one would make the first transaction other than Nakamoto.

So Hal finney is nakamoto.

Expand full comment
Oh's avatar

The first Bitcoin transaction took place on 12 January 2009, just three days after the first open-source Bitcoin client was released online. Bitcoin's creator, known only by the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, transferred 10 bitcoins to Hal Finney, an American software developer.

No one would make the first transaction other than Nakamoto.

Expand full comment
andy's avatar

Saviors are suspicious.

But even a pristine savior, if any exist/ed, becomes duplicitous secondhand via the uses his, or hers, gifts (or “gifts”) are put to by the second-handers Rand described.

Who is John Galt? Nobody I’d trust.

Or, Galt me once, shame on me ….

I know what money is. And I know what money substitutes do.

Or, derivatives is as derivatives does.

Trade, if you like. Tiptoe through those tulips manias. But the Big Short Cometh. Always.

Because big appetites, ever & always well short of satiety, are the motor of the world. And that motor is the one true perpetual motion machine ... because there's so much fellow human fuel out there that keeps it running.

Expand full comment